“There is a financial joke, whose source I don’t know, that has been circulating lately. It goes like this: if inflation continues at current rates, the purchasing power of wealth held in dollars will halve over the next eight years. But cryptocurrencies can beat that : It can lose half its value in just a few months.
haha. But crypto enthusiasts have already marketed their products as an inflation hedge. Coinbase, the largest crypto exchange in the United States, declares cryptocurrencies attractive because they are “more inflation-resistant than fiat currencies like the US dollar.” This is, not coincidentally, the same argument that people use for possession of gold.
But a funny thing happened as inflation fears grew, as shown in this chart showing the price of bitcoin in US dollars over the past year:
So why did cryptocurrency prices crash at the same moment inflation started? To some extent it may be a coincidence: If, as I do, you think crypto is very much a Ponzi scheme, this could be the moment when the scheme runs out of new suckers.
But there is also a more fundamental problem: people who have promoted cryptocurrency as a hedge against fiat inflation – a kind of digital equivalent to gold – have misunderstood how fiat currency systems work, and also, for what they are worth, they are misunderstanding what has historically driven the price of gold. In fact, rising inflation was expected to cause the price of Bitcoin to fall – although it probably won’t lead to such an epic crash.
The main point to understand is that while the dollar is already fiat currency – that is, the authorities can issue more dollars at will, without having to back those extra dollars with some kind of guarantee – America is not Venezuela or the Weimar Republic, a nation that prints money to pay bills the government. Our money supply is a policy tool the Federal Reserve uses to help keep prices fairly stable — in fact, rising about 2 percent a year — while avoiding recessions. Sometimes the Fed gets it wrong, as it has over the past year, when it (and I) failed to see higher inflation coming. But when that happens, it tries to correct the error.
What this means, in turn, is that the outbreak of inflation does not portend a spiral of persistent price hikes, which you can avoid by buying cryptocurrencies. On the contrary, markets believe the Fed will do whatever it takes to return inflation to normal levels: the five- and five-year forward inflation expectation rate, a measure derived from the differences between common US bonds and bonds indexed to the CPI, barely moves through This entire episode:
Saying that the Fed will do “whatever it takes” means that it will raise interest rates until there are clear signs that inflation is abating. The Fed has only direct control over short-term interest rates, but long-term rates have already gone up in anticipation of continued Fed tightening:
What does this mean for cryptocurrencies? Well, the rate of return that investors can get by buying bonds has gone up, which makes buying other assets, like stocks, and yes, cryptocurrency less attractive. So cryptocurrencies are not a hedge against inflation, on the contrary: when inflation rises, the Federal Reserve responds by raising interest rates, causing the cryptocurrency to fall.
The thing is, we should have learned all about this from what happened to gold after the 2008 financial crisis. Gold prices soared, which few people saw as a harbinger of runaway inflation:
But the expected inflation never came. What was happening instead was that the Fed responded to persistent economic weakness by keeping interest rates low, and low yields on bonds prompted people to invest in other things, including gold. Whatever the purpose of holding gold—something that, frankly, remains somewhat of a mystery—the one thing gold certainly isn’t is an inflation hedge. The same is true for cryptocurrencies.
So, another cryptocurrency myth is gnawing at the dust. It is hard to avoid questioning the remaining myths.
Recently, legendary seller Jim Chanos gave Bloomberg a wide-ranging interview in which he noted, speaking of cryptocurrency, that “a lot of the concepts behind its early adoption have proven that they basically, you know, don’t exist or want… you know. Well, it’s going to be an alternative currency. Well, no, it’s not. Well, it would be a diversified asset. Well, no, it wasn’t.” Now we know it’s not an inflation hedge either.
Chanos has gone on to call cryptocurrency a “predatory junkyard.” Well, I won’t go that far. Actually, after a second thought, I will. “
source: https://www.nytimes.com/2…ml?smith=nytcore-ios-share
[Reactie gewijzigd door LarBor op 22 juli 2022 19:44]
“Total coffee specialist. Hardcore reader. Incurable music scholar. Web guru. Freelance troublemaker. Problem solver. Travel trailblazer.”
More Stories
Samsung switches to a six-day work week
Are there enough charging stations and can the electricity grid handle them? The five most frequently asked questions about electric driving
House of Luna and Sven from Haaltert have been uninhabitable for several months due to a failed roof renovation: “The contractor has not been heard from again, we are mentally exhausted”